Share

Saint-Andre rejects dope claim

Marcoussis - France coach Philippe Saint-Andre on Sunday rejected an inference by a former France star that he was encouraging doping by backing a rise to around 50 minutes per match of active play from a current average of nearer 40.

"I have been coaching for 12 years and I have never asked a player to take something. For me, rugby is an exceptional sport and you can make it by drinking water and being clear" of illegal aids, said Saint-Andre.

Former international Laurent Benezech last month caused a storm by accusing rugby's authorities of turning a blind eye to doping in the sport and warned the problem could reach a similar scale to that suffered in recent years in cycling.

Benezech said evidence of the ball being in play for longer than the 30 minutes or so average from the 1990s suggested players would be under pressure to take something to stay the course.

He also said those who supported the evolution - including the national coach - to a longer period of active play were in effect "calling for doping." He also noted that Saint-Andre had gone on record as saying he would only look to select players who had the required stamina to meet the challenge of the modern game.

Prior to Benezech's comments, former France scrumhalf Jean-Pierre Elissalde had claimed amphetamines were widely taken in the sport during the 1970s and 1980s and he also admitted doping during his career.

And before that, high-ranking French anti-doping official Francoise Lasne had claimed rugby had returned the highest proportion of positive dope tests in France in 2012.

But Saint-Andre said he believed that new International Rugby Board rules on limiting scrummage and ruck time would lead to greater effective playing time.

"The effective playing time in the November Tests was 43 minutes. Add to that the new ruck rule ... and you gain six or seven minutes so you are up to 50. That's logical," he said.

Even so, Saint-Andre stressed the sport had to keep a watchful eye out for evidence of doping as "players are playing more and more and the effective playing time is rising and rising."

Of Benezech he said: "If he has names he must name names."

Saint-Andre said he would consider whether there was a case to take legal action against Benezech.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
How much would you be prepared to pay for a ticket to watch the Springboks play against the All Blacks at Ellis Park or Cape Town Stadium this year?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
R0 - R200
33% - 1816 votes
R200 - R500
32% - 1774 votes
R500 - R800
19% - 1082 votes
R800 - R1500
8% - 459 votes
R1500 - R2500
3% - 186 votes
I'd pay anything! It's the Boks v All Blacks!
5% - 252 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE