Publications
Partners
New York - New York City's decision to go ahead with its annual marathon even as many residents struggle in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy is stirring controversy among officials and even runners themselves.
Shortly after the storm, New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced that the marathon would go ahead despite the devastating storm, quickly raising hackles among some New Yorkers and their representatives.
"Lives are lost, families are homeless, and homes are destroyed, and the city is worried about the marathon. Where are our priorities?" New York congressman Michael Grimm wrote on his Twitter feed.
James Oddo, a New York City council member representing Staten Island, one of the city's boroughs worst affected by the storm, was even blunter.
"If they take one first responder from Staten Island to cover this marathon I will scream. We have people with no homes and no hope right now," he wrote on his Twitter feed.
The New York Post dedicated its front page and an editorial column to the row.
"The notion that so much as a flashlight battery would be devoted to a sporting event is outrageous," the paper's editorial said.
Bloomberg responded to the criticism on Thursday, promising that resources would not be diverted from those in need.
"The marathon's not going to redirect any focus," he pledged.
"By Sunday we'll have electricity back downtown, that will free up an enormous amount of police. Also a lot of the transportation needs that we have during the week aren't there on the weekend."
"This city is a city where we have to go on," he added.
Those planning to run the race expressed mixed feelings.
Jared Thigpen, a 32-year-old engineer, was on a bus coming from Washington DC on Friday morning, ahead of the Sunday race.
An 11-time marathon runner, he entered the lottery to run New York's race three years in a row before winning a spot.
"It's one of the biggest marathons in the world, I see it on TV every year, it looks amazing," he told AFP.
But after the storm, he had expected the city to cancel the marathon.
"I personally thought that they would and should cancel it," he said. "There are still people in need of police support and help from city officials that are now going to be distracted by putting on the race."
Christina Wallace, a 28-year-old first time marathon runner, expressed similar discomfort.
"I don't think it's the right decision," she said. "I understand the economic impact of the race but I think postponing a week or two, or rescheduling... would be preferable."
"At the very least I think the starting line should be moved from Staten Island to Brooklyn. Staten Island arguably has been hit the hardest of the boroughs... It doesn't feel right to line up yards away from that devastation."
Alex Zerden, 27, got involved with the marathon to raise money for the Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation, but is now "conflicted" about the race.
"My hope is that the resources are being put where they should be, first and foremost helping those in need now," he said.
"Helping people in need should be the first priority," he added. "But I also understand the importance of getting back to normal and maintaining the resiliency of the city."
