Time SA showed who’s boss

2011-11-16 14:50

Comment: Rob Houwing, Sport24 chief writer

Cape Town – Just winning the irritatingly short series against Australia over the next few days, in which a draw at the Wanderers is enough, would remove a particularly large monkey from South African backs.

That is obvious statistically as it would represent the Proteas’ first home series success against these arch-enemies since 1969/70, with the task proving a bridge too far in five subsequent, post-isolation summers that have seen four Aussie triumphs and one shared series.

But there is arguably even more at stake than beginning to restore the balance on that bilateral front: it is also high time for Graeme Smith’s side to throw off the shackles of frustrating inconsistency and demonstrate that they are genuinely capable of being an all-conquering “machine” in the Test arena.

That prospect looked so rosy, remember, when they knocked over the Aussies on their own turf for the first time, in heady 2008/09, following reasonably hot on the heels of also beating England in their own lair.

World domination, even considering the frequent claims of India, seemed the Proteas’ for the taking ... but it hasn’t happened, has it?

Instead of becoming a bullying, unrelentingly successful force in the manner of a Steve Waugh-era Australia, South Africa’s engine has fired with exasperating inconsistency since then.

It is as if they take their foot off the throat of fallen prey every time they get into a promising position for a much more all-embracing “kill”.

They have not subsequently managed to string together successive victories in a single series since that iconic campaign Down Under when an early triumph was achieved via back-to-back heroics at Perth and Melbourne before the Aussies won back some pride in Sydney.

Even in beating the weak West Indies 2-0 in the Caribbean in 2010 the middle Test of three was drawn, admittedly on a St Kitts featherbed of note – and of course the Proteas have also failed to win any of a trio of home series against fellow “super-league” opponents Australia, England and India.

That is why the second-placed Proteas currently remain seven ratings points behind top side England on the ICC pecking order, and knowing that they must tackle them away again next year.

All this only adds to the urgency of Graeme Smith’s side finally absorbing a series of sometimes painful lessons and proving that they can, indeed, dominate matches and series regularly.

A glance at the Test rankings for players certainly suggests the Proteas are just not punching routinely heavily enough, for whatever the reason, as a collective.

They have Dale Steyn handsomely atop the bowling list, with Morne Morkel at No 3, and in batting terms Jacques Kallis is currently at No 2 with fellow-Proteas Graeme Smith (No 7) and Hashim Amla a notch lower also cracking the top 10.

Current opponents Australia? Nobody at all in the top 10 on the batting front, and just Mitchell Johnson and Shane Watson sneaking onto the bowling chart at positions nine and 10.

This Baggy Greens side certainly seems there for the taking, after somehow managing to turn a healthy whiff of follow-on enforcement at Newlands into a disastrous, ultimately emphatic eight-wicket defeat in that extraordinary first Test.

It will be cause for ongoing bewilderment, at the very least, in their ranks, and no doubt also a source of unease which ought to be exploitable in Johannesburg by the noses-in-front Proteas.

With a bit of luck, Smith and company will be under no illusions about the imperfection of their first-Test win -- however muscular their fourth-innings chase, masterminded by the captain himself and Hashim Amla, turned out to be.

At the Wanderers over the next five days, the Proteas must show us that the scent of blood only interests them, rather than strangely repels them.

I believe that anything less than a convincing, series-sealing draw at the Wanderers only drags South Africa quite significantly backwards as a Test force.

One-all against these opponents, given their current, rare shortcomings in world-class staffing and reasonably obvious frailties in the psychological department, would be an unsatisfactory outcome for the Proteas.

Yes, another one ...


  • Victor - 2011-11-16 15:28

    Fully agree. 2-0 has a nice ring to it.

      Barry - 2011-11-16 19:29

      It depends what the bookies want. Ask them.

  • Sulaiman - 2011-11-16 15:37

    Just saw Duminy bowl a beauty to Rossouw still feel he is totally under utilised as a bowler in SA setup

      Deon - 2011-11-16 16:06

      Wanderers is not known as a spinner friendly pitch

      yazeed.khan1 - 2011-11-16 16:22

      @Deon , correct if you have the likes of Clive Eksteen , Paul Harris , Dave Rundle , Tim Shaw , Omar Henry and the likes of Nick Boje bowling. If you have a quality LEG spinner who can make the ball TALK on days 3/4 and 5 its a different story

      Paul - 2011-11-16 16:57

      Duminy has short ball jitters and is still not convincing against the ball spinning away from him. Nothing that a bit of hard work can't fix. Good to have quality like this waiting in the wings.

  • Sulaiman - 2011-11-16 15:44

    Think Philander is a great asset and can be used as an all rounder. Therefore a place for him and Tsotsobe in the Team and can cement his place when AB is being utilised as a wicketkeeper.

  • yazeed.khan1 - 2011-11-16 16:17

    People always comment that Hansie was GREAT. He only averaged 36 runs in TEST matches with a strike rate of 44 (less than 3 runs an over). He never WON a test series against Australia at home or away. He never WON a test series against England in England. He never WON a World Cup but people consider him a legend. To me he was just an upthigt captain that had no plan B (especially against the Aussies). Just saying......Your thought please?

      Peter - 2011-11-16 16:44

      Agree with you, he had talent but I never saw a plan B either. Your comments are valid. Looking forward to the game, going to be awesome. GO BOYS.

      Heiku - 2011-11-16 17:43

      He is also a dirty crook who robbed millions of fans. But yes, valid points all round.

      Jason - 2011-11-16 17:55

      100% agreed Yazeed - I always had the feeling that his 'status' was being systematically engineered and forced down the public's throat. It was as if he HAD to be The Man, for the good of the SA's re-emergence, rather than earning that reputation.

  • comurray - 2011-11-16 17:06

    Our Proteas can do it. Just play a normal game, after all you have five days at your disposal, make runs out of nothing however don't take chances and give your wickets away cheaply.

  • steven.chiaberta - 2011-11-16 19:07

    I completely agree with this article, and all the readers comments about it so far! To me there's absolutely no doubt that we have the talent, balance and options in all departments, including within the coaching staff, to dominate world cricket now. We weren't quite ready to do that after that away win in australia, but we DEFINITELY are now. I'll be bitterly disappointed if we don't: win this test and this series; pummel Sri Lanka after that; win a tight series in England next year - the poms are seriously good right now, but if we play to our potential we WILL beat them - and, as the article says, just start dominating generally.

  • Barry - 2011-11-16 22:14

    The bookie is boss is test cricket, in fact all professional cricket. Even the ICC know that.

  • pages:
  • 1