Venter is a very good appointment for the Springboks. It is an appointment to
be applauded and the results will be immediate.
get in a huff and puff about the role (for now) being on a consultancy basis.
South African Rugby Union has got this one right because in Venter they have
given Springbok coach Allister Coetzee one of the game’s innovators and they’ve
also added much needed rugby intellectual capital and coaching experience to
what was an inexperienced and inept Test coaching team in 2016.
be deterred by Venter’s Italian rugby consultancy or the fact that he has other
consultancies. He consults and his service is his rugby knowledge. How that
gets used depends on whoever is the beneficiary of his consultancy.
situation is different to most in international coaching. He prefers consulting
and working with existing coaching teams in putting in place a philosophy and a
structure. He has interests outside of professional rugby, most notably his
has in recent years made no secret that he needs the stimulation of his medical
practice. He should be applauded for being up front about the balance he seeks
as a person and also the very specific work service he provides to the game.
most important thing for now is that Venter is involved with the Springboks.
Too many very good rugby brains in this country are not utilised or consulted.
Too many are given an outdated ultimatum that they must either commit full-time
or not be a consideration.
have an invaluable role to play in Springbok rugby. It’s great to see this
finally acknowledged and even better is that the consultant is home grown and
home based. Country of origin or citizenship should never be an issue. If the
individual is good enough then use that person.
it is an advantage when that rugby consultant is a former Springbok, a World
Cup winner and culturally understands every complex dynamic of South African
rugby and South African society. It also is an advantage when that individual
is strong willed, very opinionated and doesn’t suffer fools.
isn’t a soft touch or a yes man. He doesn’t consult to be popular. There are
those who find him too intense, too abrasive, too in their face.
divides opinion and that’s because he is unconventional and refuses to stick
around if he can see he is wasting his time.
critics have accused him of doing a runner when the going gets tough, but I
disagree. I believe he leaves when he feels he can add no value or the value he
feels he can give is not maximised.
aligned to Italy because of a long association at London Irish with Italian
coach Connor O’Shea and it is unfair to want to condemn his value to the
Italian team because of heavy defeats to the All Blacks and Ireland.
philosophy and intent can also only be as good as the players with which he
works, which is why I expect there to be immediate evidence of his influence
when the Springboks play France.
has spoken glowingly of Venter’s value and I sincerely hope that Coetzee
doesn’t get spooked by Venter’s presence and doesn’t limit Venter’s role to
that of defensive and exit area specialist. Venter can give so much more to
Coetzee, especially as an advisor and sounding board when it comes to selection
had success as a player and coach in South Africa, but his coaching credentials
were made with what he achieved at Saracens and his legacy is the strength of
his succession planning at Saracens, who currently are the European and English
impact is that he can introduce systems and tutor and mentor others to continue
to evolve these systems.
role, for me, is bigger than the need to commit full-time with the Springboks.
There was a discussion about the ethics and integrity of Venter working with
the Boks now and potentially against them when Italy hosts the Boks in
November. It is very unconventional but for now the Springboks can’t refuse his
contribution because his ways are not the norm.
much rather have Venter working with the Boks against France than working with
France against the Boks. The same view applies in respect to any quality South
African coaching brain.
didn’t believe Coetzee was the right appointment as Bok coach and
wrote that before he lost eight of 12 Tests in charge. My view on him as the
head coach remains but credit to him and SARU for bringing in Venter, whose
influence will ensure the Boks will win the series against France.
Mark Keohane is a Cape-Town based award-winning rugby specialist and former Springbok Communications Manager. Follow him on Twitter
encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The
views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do
not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.
Previous Mark Keohane columns on Sport24:
South African rugby NEEDS to host RWC 2023
Why SA can't have 6 Super Rugby teams
Super 12 glory is now Super 18 gory
No winner is SARU's half-cocked overseas policy
Keeping Coetzee sadly no April Fools' joke
Mediocrity must fall!
Overseas based SA players are no traitors!
Sick Boks need more than a new doctor
Joost earned more than a minute's silence