Share

Nadal in umpire blast

Melbourne - Rafael Nadal urged chair umpires to take more responsibility after a row over a line call at a crucial moment of his four-set Australian Open battle with Tomas Berdych on Tuesday.

The Spanish second seed confronted chair umpire Carlos Bernardes near the end of the first set tie-break, urging him to take action over a ball which he believed had gone out mid-rally.

The fuming Nadal was rebuffed - and he lost the set on the very next point when Berdych sent down an ace. But Nadal fought back to win the quarter-final 6-7 (5/7), 7-6 (8/6), 6-4, 6-3 in a marathon 4hr 16min.

Afterwards Nadal, who now goes into a mouth-watering semi-final with Roger Federer, suggested umpires had grown too reliant on Hawk-Eye line technology, and should do more than simply call out the scores.

"I'm not happy. They are there to do something, not just to call 15-all or 15-30 all the match. That's the only thing I'm unhappy about," he said.

"I think that with Hawk-Eye, the umpires have much less pressure than before," Nadal added.

"Carlos is a fantastic umpire, one of the best on tour. But for everybody the work now in matches is much easier. They don't feel as much pressure as before, because at the end, if you want to stop, you stop."

In a repeat of the 2010 Wimbledon final won by Nadal, the Spanish second seed struggled to impose himself early against Berdych.

The Czech seventh seed, unsettling Nadal with the power of his shot-making, missed a golden opportunity to take the first set when he squandered four set points in the 12th game but won the tie-break after the line controversy.

Nadal missed out on a set point in the 12th game of the second set but he then saved a Berdych set point in the tie-break, and the pumped-up Spaniard levelled the match when the Czech went long.

Second seed Nadal began to seize the initiative as Berdych faded, taking the third set 6-4 and breaking in the first game of the fourth set with a searing forehand winner down the line.

And Berdych, whose previous match ended in bitterness after he accused Nicolas Almagro of deliberately targeting him with a forehand, could find no way back as Nadal sealed the win.

Hawk-Eye was at the centre of a furious bust-up involving David Nalbandian, who was refused permission to make a challenge at the climax of his five-set defeat to John Isner.

Nalbandian was later fined US$8 000 for splashing water at a tournament worker, an accusation he strenuously denies.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
How much would you be prepared to pay for a ticket to watch the Springboks play against the All Blacks at Ellis Park or Cape Town Stadium this year?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
R0 - R200
33% - 1817 votes
R200 - R500
32% - 1777 votes
R500 - R800
19% - 1083 votes
R800 - R1500
8% - 460 votes
R1500 - R2500
3% - 187 votes
I'd pay anything! It's the Boks v All Blacks!
5% - 254 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE