Share

FA soccer leaders criticized for 'sham' diversity plan

LONDON - England soccer leaders were criticized Monday for introducing diversity reforms that campaigners say still fail to ensure minority groups are adequately represented in the decision-making process.

Kick It Out, English soccer's anti-discrimination group, said the Football Association's planned overhaul of its board and council appears to be "sham" and "won't satisfy minority groups."

The FA has been threatened with the loss of public funding unless more woman and ethnic minorities are brought into the decision-making process. The House of Commons has already declared it has "no confidence" in the FA over its failure to reflect modern society in England.

The FA Council will add 11 members to ensure it "better reflects the inclusive and diverse nature of English football," the governing body said. The FA also plans to guarantee three places for women on its board and restrict members to three terms of three years. But there will not be "proper representation of minority groups" even after the board is redesigned, Kick It Out chairman Herman Ouseley said.

"I would not trust these bodies to fully deliver transparent practices and the changes are likely to be a sham," Ouseley added in a statement. "All the historical evidence suggests this, so I have no confidence in the proposals. I know that all minority groups will feel aggravated at the hands of the football authorities."

In the council's current 122 members, 114 are men, 92 are aged over 60 and only four are from ethnic minorities. And the council, which FA chairman Greg Clarke is pushing to hold sessions in public in future, has to approve the proposed changes. It also has to comply with the government's new code for sports bodies. But ministers must tread a cautious path to avoid FIFA sanctioning England if there is deemed to be government interference.

"If (the government) say 'This is unacceptable,' I don't know who is going to do better and if you trust government to come in and run football, yabadabadoo, let them have a go," Clarke said. "Whether FIFA can do anything, you'd have to ask a lawyer. If we go out of our way to annoy them and they want some payback they could cut up rough."

Clarke described his blueprint as a "once-in-a-generation opportunity to fundamentally change the way football works" and urged the FA Council to pass the changes next month.

"I've had that conversation from someone saying, 'you can't force me,'" Clarke said. "I said, 'Try me. Take me on. In the court of public opinion if you think you can keep stuffing the council with grey-haired white men.'"

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
How much would you be prepared to pay for a ticket to watch the Springboks play against the All Blacks at Ellis Park or Cape Town Stadium this year?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
R0 - R200
33% - 1817 votes
R200 - R500
32% - 1777 votes
R500 - R800
19% - 1084 votes
R800 - R1500
8% - 461 votes
R1500 - R2500
3% - 187 votes
I'd pay anything! It's the Boks v All Blacks!
5% - 254 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE