Share

MP defies court, names Giggs

London - Britain's press celebrated on Tuesday after a British lawmaker defied a court ruling to name Ryan Giggs as the footballer who used an injunction to keep details of an alleged affair secret.

Liberal Democrat lawmaker John Hemming named the Manchester United player using his centuries-old right to freedom of speech in the House of Commons, despite an injunction which gave the married sportsman anonymity in the British media.

Hemming acted after a Scottish newspaper on Sunday published Giggs's photograph, arguing that it could no longer support a gagging order while the footballer had been named by thousands of people on microblogging site Twitter.

"With about 75 000 people having named Ryan Giggs on Twitter it's obviously impractical to imprison them all," Hemming told the House of Commons.

Hemming was rebuked by the Speaker, but not before journalists had taken note - the media are entitled to report parliamentary proceedings without fear of being sued, and Hemming's words were swiftly used nationwide to name Giggs.

The Sun hailed the move in an editorial entitled "Freedom wins", saying: "The Giggs shambles proves that court injunctions, as a weapon of protection for the rich and powerful, are useless in the age of Twitter and Facebook."

The tabloid's owners, Rupert Murdoch's News Group Newspapers, had on Monday twice failed to get the gag order lifted at the High Court.

Their first attempt before Hemming's remarks was rejected by judge David Eady, who said: "The court's duty remains to try and protect the claimant, and particularly his family, from intrusion and harassment so long as it can."

After Hemming spoke out The Sun tried again, but was rejected.

Prime Minister David Cameron admitted on Monday that the current situation regarding privacy laws and the Internet was "unsustainable" and his government later said it was setting up a parliamentary committee to look into the issue.

"It's not fair on the newspapers if all the social media can report this and the newspapers can't, so the law and the practice has got to catch up with how people consume media today," Cameron said in an interview with ITV.

He added: "But there's a difficulty here because the law is the law and the judges must interpret what the law is."

A columnist for the Daily Mail on Tuesday urged the leader to "put our politically motivated judges back in their boxes, saying: 'No one has voted for secret justice in Britain'."

Despite the furore, Giggs is likely to be in the Manchester United lineup for the Champions League final against Barcelona on Saturday where he could add to his record as the most decorated player in the history of the English game.

In a bid to stem the online debate, Giggs's lawyers announced Friday they were taking legal action to force Twitter to reveal the identity of users who broke the gagging order. But it only provoked more indignant Tweets.

Hemming later said it was this action that prompted him to name Giggs, saying: "He was going after the ordinary people who have been gossiping about him on Twitter."

At the weekend, Scotland's Sunday Herald became the first British newspaper or broadcaster to name the player who allegedly had an affair with reality television star Imogen Thomas.

The newspaper argued that it was not bound by the High Court, whose jurisdiction only extends to England and Wales.

Hemming's intervention has set up a confrontation with Britain's top two judges, who specifically warned lawmakers on Friday to think twice before undermining court orders in parliament.

They spoke out after a member of the House of Lords on Thursday had revealed that Fred Goodwin, the former boss of the bailed-out Royal Bank of Scotland, had won an injunction banning publication of details of an alleged affair.

The High Court subsequently quashed the anonymity order that had been protecting him.


Scotland's Sunday Herald (File)

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
66% - 668 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
34% - 345 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE