Share

Gold breaks his Bok silence

Springbok assistant coach Gary Gold has broken his silence, admitting that the away leg of this year’s Vodacom Tri Nations was a failure, but vowed the coaching staff would work tirelessly to make the home leg a success.

Gold admitted in his online blog at rugbyiq.com that the Boks had executed their game plan poorly, but took another dig at referees by implying the difference between Super 14 and Tri Nations success was refereeing from the Northern Hemisphere. He also refused to believe the Bok game plan was outdated or old fashioned, as some critics have claimed.

“To say that the tour was not a success would be the understatement of the year. And while many of you rugby supporters are understandably annoyed and irritated with the team's performances, it is our responsibility - and job - to not get caught up in a wave of emotion but, rather, objectively and systematically go about fixing the problem. Something which Peter de Villiers, as the head coach, is very good at doing,” Gold wrote.

“I believe that the cardinal rule about learning from our losses is that we need to focus our time and attention on the issues that we can control - in so doing we need to be honest and harsh about the things that we have done wrong; as an entire group. That said, I truly believe whilst there certainly were other external factors that aided our poor performances, spending time moaning and deliberating over these issues is counter-productive and takes our focus away from fixing the areas of our game that we can control.

Gold added that while it was a popular view at the moment that the Boks kicked too much while in New Zealand, the match statistics show that the All Blacks actually kicked more than the Boks.

“However, what is unquestionable is that their kicks - in their intentions and execution - were all superior to those of ours. Their kicks were on target more often and their chase was aggressive and accurate; in fact, their entire kicking strategy put us under similar pressure to what we did to them last year.

“You see, friends, what is really important is that we get to the bottom of whether our intended strategy and plan is wrong, as is widely report, or simply our execution. I believe the latter.

“Our kicks were generally inaccurate, we chased and aligned poorly and then failed on far too many occasions to make the first-time tackle intended to pin them deep in their own 22 - which, of course, exerts pressure and hopefully leads to turnovers. That is why I firmly believe, and clearly like NZ do, that the strategy is good - but on this tour our execution was far below our acceptable standard.”

Gold believes there is an irony in the claims the Boks aren’t “advancing the game” in the same way the Aussies and New Zealanders have.

“At last November's SANZAR conference; the Super 14 teams from Australia, New Zealand and South Africa were told in no uncertain terms that four areas of the game were going to be heavily policed and teams not adhering to the refreshed interpretations of these four areas would be heavily penalised and thus be left behind. (The area that was most significantly going to be managed, would be the breakdown - with particular attention to the defending team allowing the attacking team to generate quick ball.)

“There is no doubt that South Africa's Super 14 teams - through some astute coaching - adapted magnificently; an example of that is the team that conceded the most penalties in the 2010 Super 14 were the Crusaders, followed by the Hurricanes.

“In all, the Crusaders conceded 90 penalties; of those 75 penalties were conceded whilst on defence - mainly against effecting opposition from gaining quick ball.

“As we know, the Super 14 culminated in two SA sides meeting in the final and I am sure none of our Antipodean teams would disagree that they were the two best teams throughout the competition.

“How then, can it be possible that a few weeks later a Springbok team - made up largely of these same players - are now being accused of not 'keeping up' with how the game has advanced?

“And, here lies the irony...

“SANZAR instructed and initiated the new law interpretations and used 17 referees - from Australia, NZ and SA only - in 99 Super Rugby matches this season. Yet, to date, not one of those 17 referees have featured in the Tri-Nations (until this weekend - with our very own Craig Joubert in charge in Melbourne).

Gold said the team was admittedly “defenceless” when it came to their defence pattern on tour and this was something they would have to rectify.

“This is an area we will be giving massive attention to in the coming weeks as we build up to our next game in Soweto.

“The team has always prided itself in its strong defence and in the past that strong defence has given us a favourable reward by being able to turn over opposition ball. So, I am confident that rectify it.

“We are a tight squad under Pete's leadership and nobody will shirk the hard work as we look to rectify our performances. Everybody in the Bok squad is very passionate about what they do, and how they do it, and there is a great camaraderie between everyone - all of whom have one goal; Bok victories. “

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
67% - 922 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
33% - 447 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE