Share

Mallett: Cheetahs deserved a penalty try

Cape Town - Former Springbok coach Nick Mallett has criticised referee Stuart Berry’s officiating of the scrums during the Sharks v Cheetahs Super Rugby match in Durban at the weekend.

The men from Bloemfontein had the upper hand in the scrums and in one particular moment in the first half they had the Sharks on the ropes on their own goal-line.

The Cheetahs were leading 7-3 in the 24th minute when they put severe pressure on the Sharks scrum.

The Cheetahs looked set to score, but the buckling Sharks scrum kept collapsing. Sharks tighthead prop Coenie Oosthuizen, in particular, had a torrid time of things.

Despite protests from Cheetahs captain Francois Venter, Berry decided a penalty try was not warranted.

The Sharks emerged from that particular passage of play unscathed and went on to win 26-10.

Mallett, though, felt Berry was wrong not to award a penalty try to the Sharks and shared his thoughts in the SuperSport studio:

“Referee Stuart Berry saw a different picture to me. Coenie Oosthuizen was under tremendous pressure at the scrum, going sideways and backwards. His knees were on the ground, the Cheetahs were going forward and the only reason they didn't score is because the Sharks collapsed the scrum,” said Mallett.

“There was no reason to go back for another (third) penalty for the Cheetahs, it should have been a penalty try. Berry said there was no possibility of a penalty try because the Cheetahs weren’t going forward, but you cannot go forward if the opposition front row is lying on the ground.”

According to Mallett, the Sharks’ first try by JP Pietersen was a result of another error from Berry at scrum time, when the official gave a free kick to the Sharks after he deemed the Cheetahs had pushed early.

"The dominance of the Cheetahs scrum was such that Sharks scrumhalf Michael Claassens took forever to put the ball in and then Berry decided to penalise the Cheetahs for pushing early and from there the Sharks scored. Berry’s handling of the scrums, in my view, was not right. I’m really confused with Oosthuizen at tighthead. He was clearly scrumming inwards in front of the referee and yet the Sharks got away without a penalty being given against them and they got a penalty from which they scored.

According to Mallett, Oosthuizen should not play at tighthead.

“Coenie is a very good player with ball in hand, a good tackler and he turns ball over, but he is not a good tighthead prop and we’ve seen that for the last three seasons. I don’t know why the Sharks didn’t start Lourens Adriaanse, they may have a rotation policy. But it’s far better to get a good scrummager for the first half and the next 10 minutes after the break and get Coenie on for the last 30 minutes when everyone is tired.”

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
loading... Live
Dolphins 0
Warriors RSA 6/1
loading... Live
Pakistan 11/0
New Zealand 178/7
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
65% - 411 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
35% - 224 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE