Share

Mamabalo lawyer slams SAIDS

Johannesburg - A member of Ludwick Mamabolo's legal team lashed out at the SA Institute for Drug Free Sport (Saids) on Friday after the anti-doping body announced that the Comrades Marathon winner's B-sample had tested positive.

"The anti-doping rules of Saids provide for confidentiality during processes and hearings relating to allegations of doping," human rights lawyer Brian Currin said in a statement.

"The confidentiality provision was breached after the A-sample test, causing irreparable damage to Mr Ludwick Mamabolo's reputation and brand.

"Saids has chosen to breach their own rules, once again, by publishing the results of the B-sample."

However, Saids said the guidelines of the World Anti-Doping Code gave it the right to publicly release the name of an athlete who had been informed of doping charges prior to the tribunal phase.

Saids CEO Khalid Galant said this option was exercised when the nature of the event, in terms of prize money, medals and playoff ramifications, had immediate relevance.

Mamabolo's attorneys, Werksmans, said they would advise him on his legal remedies in relation to Saids' "violations".

They believed there was a matter of concern in the sample reports.

"Having considered the available evidence in relation to the process of taking his urine after completion of the Comrades Marathon, I have grave concerns about the efficacy of the samples taken," Currin said.

"I have also carefully studied the Sample A and Sample B reports and find what I believe to be a material defect.

"These issues will be dealt with at the tribunal hearing. No further details will be provided at this stage."

Mamabolo's B-sample confirmed the presence of methylhexaneamine after his A-sample tested positive for the banned stimulant following his victory in the 89km ultra-marathon in Durban last month.

Galant said the analysis of the B-sample had taken place at the SA Doping Control Laboratory in Bloemfontein. Mamabolo was present and witnessed the breaking of the seal of the sample.

It would take approximately three months for a decision to be handed down, according to Saids, but Galant said some cases took longer to conclude due to adjournments or requests to present additional evidence in mitigation.

Mamabolo would have the right to lodge an appeal against the tribunal decision, if he disagreed with the sanction.

Currin said Mamabolo continued to maintain his innocence.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should Siya Kolisi keep the captaincy as the Springboks build towards their World Cup title defence in 2027?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Siya will only be 36 at the next World Cup. He can make it!
26% - 1223 votes
No! I think the smart thing to do is start again with a younger skipper ...
30% - 1419 votes
I'd keep Siya captain for now, but look to have someone else for 2027.
45% - 2151 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE