Share

Khan queries unidentified man

London - British boxer Amir Khan posted a series of pictures on Twitter on Thursday showing what he says is an unidentified man "interfering" with the WBA fight supervisor during his split-decision loss to American Lamont Peterson in their light-welterweight title bout.

Khan appealed the scoring and raised new questions about last month's fight on his Twitter feed, pointing out a man wearing a hat who sits down ringside next to WBA supervisor Michael Welsh during the bout. The man is seen leaning over Welsh several times and appears to pick up a scorecard on at least two occasions.

"From round 6 all the way through to round 12 this guy starts to interfere with what Michael (Welsh) is doing," Khan tweeted.

Khan tweeted that the man's behavior is "strictly against the rules," adding that his team has asked the IBF and fight organizers about the man's identity without getting a response.

"Who is this guy? And what was he doing?" Khan wrote.

The 25-year-old Englishman lost his IBF and WBA titles in the December 11 defeat in Washington after points were deducted on two occasions for pushing. When filing the appeal, Khan questioned why it took so long for the winner to be announced and claimed the scorecards were changed before the results were read out by the ring announcer.

The IBF said it can't comment on Khan's string of tweets before the appeals hearing on January 18. WBA officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

The boxer linked to several still images from TV coverage of the fight showing the man sitting ringside next to Welsh, and another link to a YouTube clip of the bout.

"This is what I meant on how he was interfeering (sic)," Khan wrote in a caption for one picture, which appears to show the man reaching across the table in front of Welsh while peering over his shoulder.

With another picture, he wrote: "This time in round 11 he's seen here clearly picking up a yellow judges slip."

Khan's business manager Asif Vali told Sky Sports News that the boxer simply wants to find out what the man was doing before his appeals hearing.

"We don't know who the official is," Vali said. "We've asked the question, we've written to (organisers) and we're still waiting for their response, and we've written to the IBF and they've still not responded."

Vali added that "there's obviously something wrong there."

"If the answers are legitimate, fine, we'll accept them," he said. "If they're not legitimate, then we hope the rematch takes place, and if the rematch takes place, all this can be squashed."

Another pic of the guy wearing the hat interfering different camera angle. @AmirKingKhan

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
loading... Live
Arsenal 5
Chelsea 0
Voting Booth
How much would you be prepared to pay for a ticket to watch the Springboks play against the All Blacks at Ellis Park or Cape Town Stadium this year?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
R0 - R200
32% - 1843 votes
R200 - R500
32% - 1810 votes
R500 - R800
19% - 1100 votes
R800 - R1500
8% - 470 votes
R1500 - R2500
3% - 193 votes
I'd pay anything! It's the Boks v All Blacks!
5% - 261 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE