Proteas in Australia
Proteas were stodgy, but...
Cape Town - South Africa’s heroic stone-walling initiative
to save the second Test against Australia at Adelaide on Monday may have been
unusually laboured from a run-tempo point of view, but was still some way off
threatening records in that regard.
And if any frustrated Aussie tells you the fifth day’s play
was like watching paint dry, quickly remind him or her that their country was
involved in both of the top two instances of fewest runs in a full day’s play.
The Proteas, led by assured Faf du Plessis and his unbeaten
century on debut, including occupation of the crease for all of day five,
posted 171 runs in 98 overs on Monday - not exactly the stuff Twenty20 fans’
dreams would be made of - for the loss of four wickets.
Australia v South Africa 2nd Test Day 5 Highlights
But that still leaves them well outside the top 10 for
slowest completed days in the most traditional form of the game, especially as
Morné Morkel upped the tempo “dramatically” by striking successive fours in
Peter Siddle’s final over of the match.
In each instance Aussie fielders let the ball trickle to the
ropes when it could have been stopped, because they wanted to keep the
less-fancied man on strike, but Morkel held his nerve to secure the draw
The most tedious day
ever came in Karachi in 1956/57, when the Aussies limped their way to 80 all
out against Pakistan on the first day, and the host nation replied with 15 for
two before the close: 95 runs in total.
Karachi had the dubious distinction not long afterwards
(1959/60) of earning second place as Pakistan registered 104 runs on the fourth
day’s play, also against Australia.
There are two instances of South Africa being involved in
“top tenners” on the funereal list, and both have come in the post-isolation
era, interestingly enough.
In fourth place was the 1992/93 New Year Test at Newlands
between Kepler Wessels’s recently re-admitted SA side and India, which was
notoriously low-tempo throughout.
On the fifth day of the tedious final-Test draw, 111 runs
were scored, as the home team inched their way from 48 for two to 130 for six
declared (97 overs eaten up for that second innings) and the Indians, 1-0 down
and nominally set 215 to win with no chance of getting there, shook hands after
getting to 29 for one.
The Kingsmead faithful were “lucky” enough to witness the
game that occupies 10th place for slowest day ... England crawled to
135 for two in 85 overs (peculiarly on day one when they weren’t even
surrendering wickets at a rate of knots) in 1999/2000.
In another statistical quirk from the Adelaide Test, cricket
website www.espncricinfo.com has
indicated that AB de Villiers, who played a key support role to Du Plessis in
the shut-out campaign, has posted at least 150 runs on every previous occasion
where he has faced the number of balls (220) he got in the SA second innings.
Here he was extraordinarily restrained, given the
circumstances, as he only got 33 runs at a decidedly un-De Villiers-like strike
rate of 15.
Avid Test-lovers, and particularly those partial to the
Proteas on Monday, will insist that there can be beauty and great satisfaction
in a day of grim resilience.
This was one of them.
*Follow our chief
writer on Twitter: @RobHouwing