Cricket

Amla joins SA batting greats

2010-02-07 16:10
Email | Print
Hashim Amla in great form. (Gallo Images)

Johannesburg - Hasim Amla took his career to a significant new level when he made his maiden Test match double century and went on to a career first-class best as well on the second day of the first Test against India at Nagpur on Sunday.

The Proteas' No. 3 might have made that double century at Chennai two years ago when he was unfortunate to be run out on 159 or at the Bidvest Wanderers Stadium the year before when the declaration came at his previous highest score of 176.

But the fact that he had to wait a bit longer may have been appropriate because this time he has had to bat under far more testing conditions on a pitch that has favoured spin bowlers throughout and after also having to re-build the first innings from a perilous 6/2.

By the time he had finished with an unbeaten 253 when Graeme Smith applied the declaration the Proteas had their highest ever Test total in India of 558/6 on the board and the pressure is now squarely on the Indians to come out of this contest in good shape.

They made a promising enough start with 24/0 on the board off four overs by the close but the hard work still lies ahead of them.

It was easy to forget the contribution Jacques Kallis had made in taking his score to 173 (351 balls, 15 fours and 2 sixes) before falling to one of the many deliveries that would start to nip unpredictably such was the domination of Amla on day two.

When Kallis was dismissed the pair had put together South Africa's third best third wicket stand of 340 and the best for any wicket against India. The double century continues to elude South Africa's best player but he is nevertheless proud to lead a batting unit that is as strong as any in the world at the moment.

"Hashim got written off by a lot of people at the start of his career," commented Kallis, "but he has proven them all wrong. That sums up the character of the man that he is. He has become a very important part of our top order and he is going to make many more runs for South Africa."

Amla himself paid tribute to the grand master of South African modern batsmanship. "There is no better place to learn from a batting master class than to have the box office seat at the other end of the pitch," he said of Kallis' innings.

Of his own innings he commented: "I enjoyed reaching an important milestone but it is more important to put the side in a strong position.

I will be even happier if we can pick up some quick wickets in the morning. It was a challenge to bat through a whole day's play and there were some testing moments against the spinners and again when the seamers got the ball to reverse."

One of the highlights for any connoisseur of Test match cricket was to watch the different techniques that the various batsmen employed against the spinners.

Both Kallis and Amla took advantage of the slow pitch to spend a lot of time on the back foot although the latter came down the wicket to reach his double century with a beautiful cover drive off Virender Sehwag.

AB de Villiers by contrast advanced metres down the pitch even to defend and he and Amla produced the most attractive batting of the day in a fourth wicket stand of 108 in 29 overs. But even such natural hitters as De Villiers and Mark Boucher perished when they attempted to force the pace.

Perhaps the most important statistic for the Proteas and an indication of how their batting has developed was that Harbhajan Singh and Amit Mishra bowled 99 overs between them and took 2/306.

It was a day of records both for Amla and the Proteas.

His innings of 253 not out was South Africa's highest on the sub-continent, beating Graeme Smith's 232 against Bangladesh.

It was also the highest against India beating the 217 not out of AB de Villiers two years ago.

It was the highest by a South African No. 3 batsman, beating Jacques Rudolph's 222 not out against Bangladesh.

It was the seventh highest score for South Africa in Test cricket and only 24 runs short of Smith's national record.

He was the 14th South African to score a Test double century and the eighth since unity.

It was the 22nd double century scored for South Africa and the 14th since unity.

The South African total was South Africa's highest in India beating the 540 they made at Chennai two years ago.

South Africa's highest team total against India is 563 at the OUTsurance Oval in Bloemfontein in 2001.

In the words of Smith: "Kallis led the team performance on day one and Amla on day two. It is now up to the bowlers to lead us on day three."

 

Your Comments

Dragonpig2/12/2010 9:53 AM
To those who were commenting on the look on Smiths face as Amla got "closer to the record" did any of you think it might have had something to do with the fact Smith wanted Amla to get 250 or the record, but wanted 10-12 overs at india, so maybe he was looking worried that by letting Amla get 250 he wouldn't get to bowl at India, that look on his face was not about the record, rather about the lack of overs, and AJ is right about the strike rates too
AJ @ Zee2/12/2010 5:47 AM
Not sure how much more friendly the wicket was for Smith (compared to India track), but his strike rate was over 74 at the time, that is what allowed him to make 277. Sehwag made 300 against us at over a run a ball as I recall. Amla would have needed another 15 overs to get that record and a lot more to get 300. We made better use of those overs bowling to India, getting Gambhir (ranked No 1 in world) very cheaply. I am not saying anything Hashim would not tell you either. I simply dont understand why people are trying so hard to find something malevolent in Smith's decision, when from a cricketing perspective it was 100% the right call (I would have declared a little earlier in fact). I would hae liked 10 over at India before stumps.
keith2/12/2010 3:33 AM
amla scores doubles on dead pitches. lara has scored doubles against the aussies...against warne mcgrath and the rest of those 'sledgers'!
Dragonpig2/11/2010 10:47 AM
Get over it guys, Hashim got his 250 then Smith declared. . . I would bet most of you who hate Smith now for not letting Hash get the record would attack our captain if he let Hash get to 300 and we drew needing 1 wicket off the last ball and didn't get it. . . sure it looks bad because we won in 4 days, who could predict Dale Steyn to have bowled that spell? at one stage india was on 221-4 so it looked like they would bat for longer then Steyn destroyed them, maybe if we won the game in the last 2 overs you would have praised Smith, but no I think you would have said Smith let it get too close and our bowlers weren't convincing....Amla didn't bat slowly, his strike rate was fine but it wasn't fast enough to get the triple centuary, and India started playing slow cricket and not letting Hash get there, they were probably hoping to strangle the scoring so Amla took forever to get to 300 and then they could draw. Team decision, Amla would probably be disappointed but acknowledge the team comes first and not be bitter about it. Huge fan of Amla, great team player
No Records for non-whites2/10/2010 3:54 PM
To all those comments about Hashim batting too slow, his strike rate was actually better than Kallis's (53.49 Amla compared to 49.29 Kallis). Graeme does not want to be second to anyone, why declare if you gonna let them face 3 overs? Why not declare earlier or overnight? If he had declared overnight it would have made more sense!
Zee @ AJ the "genius"2/10/2010 2:44 PM
AJ, you say that Kallis and Amla both had all the time in the world to score their runs and that it was their fault for batting too slowly. There are however other considerations to take into account: Smith opened the batting, so he didn't have the pressure of coming in at 6/2. Smith batted on a far more batsman-friendly wicket in reaching his total. And I have to say, at that stage, England's bowling attack was probably one of the worst in the world at the time. We are talking about 24 runs here, I don't particularly love or hate Graeme Smith but for 24 runs and a total of that size on the board already, I think he probably could have afforded the opportunity to Amla. Either way, it was a phenomenal victory - India were outplayed in every single session.
Zee @ AJ the "genius"2/10/2010 1:20 PM
AJ, you say that Kallis and Amla both had all the time in the world to score their runs and that it was their fault for batting too slowly. There are however other considerations to take into account: Smith opened the batting, so he didn't have the pressure of coming in at 6/2. Smith batted on a far more batsman-friendly wicket in reaching his total. And I have to say, at that stage, England's bowling attack was probably one of the worst in the world at the time. We are talking about 24 runs here, I don't particularly love or hate Graeme Smith but for 24 runs and a total of that size on the board already, I think he probably could have afforded the opportunity to Amla. Either way, it was a phenomenal victory - India were outplayed in every single session.
kurt2/9/2010 9:25 PM
Smith did the same to Gibbs some years back. Gibbs equaled the record for successive one day hundreds which stood at three. In the next game chasing a small target he stole the strike from Gibbs and left him stranded on 96 which meant that he would have bettered the record and would have been the lone holder.Graeme a d@@s
F@cK2/9/2010 4:16 PM
Smith and his captaincy, Amla could have beaten that record! What a turd Kapitan Graeme is! flipn sour twit, wot he score? 6? had money on that record falling, d@mn drunken bar bets... oh nose, wooo a draw, he batted too long, a draw is inevitable... B.S.
Kabir2/9/2010 2:38 PM
Okay so Amla batted slow, if thats the excuse you guys are using, then why not let him post the highest score for a South African? Yes I have to say i cant shake the feeling that if it was AB or Kallis or even smith himself a chance would have been given to be the 1st S.A batsmen to make 300!! Thats an honour and S.A need that! We won the game with a whole day to spare, smith could have given Amla 10-15 overs more to get his triple ton and if he didnt then declare anyway. It sucks that Smith holds the record and we know that he is a great batsmen and a good captain who is a hero when HE is needed. But that tight t shirt wearing, collar pooping fool is an egoist and so he it showed, only for himslef he thinks...
on the fence2/9/2010 2:13 PM
I dont know hey.... I rate Smith was scared Amla was going to break his record. But then again, Hashim does bat REEEEEALLY slowly, so we'll never know. Lets all just get over it
@Dragonpig2/9/2010 10:24 AM2/9/2010 12:05 PM
could not have said it better myself
Dragonpig2/9/2010 10:24 AM
"Greame Smith is a selfish disgusting captain for not letting Hashim Amla break his record or get to 300" "South Africa should have declared earlier, what good is it that Amla got 300 and we drew, Greame Smith you're a moron, the declaration should have come earlier" "Greame Smith and Corrie Van Zyl didn't want Hashim Amla to get the record because he's a player of colour" go ahead take your pick, lets blame Greame Smith for ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING! I mean it's not as if he has a test average of over 50, its not as if he's the number 2 test batsman on the ICC rankings, Its not as if he would come out and bat with a broken hand to save a test match for his team, not as if he started his captaincy career when S.A was in trouble and has now got a 45% win rate (Vs a 29% loss-which is due to his first few years as captain) Come on the guy is a fantastic captain, I would bet Smith said he wanted an hour to bowl at the Indians and told Hash to push it (as you see with most big scores in tests, such as Sehwags 300's the strike rate picks up, the one he scored against us was more than 100 strike rate) Hash had his chance, he batted too slowly, but he put us in a fantaastic position and now Steyn is dominating. Well done Amla, what a show, well done Steyn, well done S.A! all you haters, grow up, don't look for the negatives in here, how many of you attacked Smith but didn't acknowledge Amla's batting?
Len2/9/2010 9:54 AM
Why do you people just keep your sorry opinions to yourselves. G.S. and H.A. are great cricketers and great gentlemen playing for their great country the best they can. What happens if we bowl India out with ONE RUN to spare? You people will probably nod sagely and say, quietly, that G.S. was right.
To Islam 2/8/2010 4:06 PM
DUDE!!!!!!!! whats ur buzz. The guys were merely giving their views & 1 was merely answering a question posed earlier by another user so who the hell died & left you in charge to play God. Any ways this discussions is about CRICKET not RELIGION so lets concentrate on that. I did think that GS was a bit dof to declare at that stage purely because I expected MUCH more from the Indians and a lot less from our bowlers so personally though the score may have been a bit too low to defend. Must admit that Declaration makes a valid point - surely the situtaion was discussed at tea and agreed upon. Maybe Hash was given a specific time period to try & reach the record and if he didnt then the captain would call it - Maybe/maybe not - we'll probably never know. Brother Hashim I am proud of you as a muslim, an Indian but most importantly a SOUTH AFRICAN.
slaptjips.2/8/2010 3:45 PM
as someone mentioned earlier:1) its a team game, on tv you could see the decision being discussed between coach and capt .2) hashim would have only 5 overs to get the runs,not 10 as prev mentioned,2 overs are lost for change of innings.if this were an australian team,the same thing would have been done,nothing worse than fielding for 2 days and then having to go out and bat for a few overs with nothing to gain but lose your wicket,true crciketing followers will understand,the rest seemed to sees things from a personal vendetta and political point of view.well done hashim,well done kallis,well done steyn,great team effort thus far.
slaptjips.2/8/2010 3:31 PM
as someone mentioned earlier:1) its a team game, on tv you could see the decision being discussed between coach and capt .2) hashim would have only 5 overs to get the runs,not 10 as prev mentioned,2 overs are lost for change of innings.if this were an australian team,the same thing would have been done,nothing worse than fielding for 2 days and then having to go out and bat for a few overs with nothing to gain but lose your wicket,true crciketing followers will understand,the rest seemed to sees things from a personal vendetta and political point of view.well done hashim,well done kallis,well done steyn,great team effort thus far.
@tt ntbarie2/8/2010 3:19 PM
its a sunna...just like wearing a fez.... do ur research... knowledge is power ...leave the religious stuff.. well done SA
Islam2/8/2010 3:00 PM
Why is there differing opinions about the treatment of the beard by Muslims when you guys should be agreeing and giving one simple answer? No blade on head or blade? It seems some of those responding are just fake muslims or they are real muslims but don't know their religion,potential terrorists.
Sam2/8/2010 2:19 PM
Bootom Line, I have been a keen 'follower' of the the game for many a year, never seen a declaration with 3 overs to go. GS is only like by the rest of his WASP followers here becuase he is theit last great hope. Mark my words, Hash is becoming too powerful for ol Smitty so he will be dropped at the earliest chance, Amla has proven id mettle in the ODI's. Kallis was dropped in the past, shockingly with some poor excuse. Smith is worse than Hitler, at least with Hitler you know what's coming.
ntbarie2/8/2010 1:26 PM
@ Waleed Toefy,Please don't answer religious questions you clearly have truthfull answers to!Growing a beard in Islam "IS COMPULSORY!!!" We cannot answer for other muslim players not growing their beards as that is their porogotive and will be answerable.Anyways, this forum is about cricket, not religion!
declaration2/8/2010 1:19 PM
Some good comments here but majority is a load of BS. Im sure at tea time the team spoke about a declaration and Amla was a heads up to when it will happen. Maybe they agreed with a declaration before close to get a couple of overs in. All we doing is speculating. Declaration of a innings is not only the captains call but have to coincide with the game plan. Well done to Smith for delaying it for Amla to get to 250.
D@P2/8/2010 1:06 PM
Typical. A South African hits an unbelievable knock and there are still some IDIOTS coming up with some or the other racial comments. This is not the forum for this. Please go comment on political stories. Get it? This is sport. Grow up please. Let the rest of us celebrate this momentous occasion in peace.
Player232/8/2010 1:01 PM
And imagine if it was apartheid days he would have not been allowed to play for SA, becos of his skin and not his talent. Bliksems say they shouldn't shoulder the blame.
Mojo @Jaf2/8/2010 12:36 PM
Jaf you obviously know jaf shyt about cricket... The 253 Amla made put us in a winning position and now Steyn & Morkel are sealing the deal. Of course its the captain who chooses when to declare. We can see you never played cricket before either, you comment from the couch you fat boy!
H2/8/2010 12:27 PM
pdw @ 2/7/2010 8:16 PM.....putting a blade to your skin is a matter of differing opinion.....But why are we discussing the man's Religion when we should be tallking Cricket?
The Judge2/8/2010 12:18 PM
Reading all ur comments I can only deduce that it's Graeme Smith's personality and character that has promted such accusations and in all fairness the guy has brought it on himself! As for the Indian record it's not Laxman but rather Virender Sewag who has 2 tripple centuries if memory serves me correct. Also don't compare innings with regards to balls faced etc cos each situation is different. Amla came in with the team in crisis and needed to be solid and with kallis at the crease he was bound to play second fiddle which he did with aplomb. Well done Amla and Kallis and Dale Steyn take a bow. 7!!!!! Wow! Let's stop all this negativity and get behind our team. If Amla has issues with Smith it will surface at the end of the day but let's not speculate and judge ANYONE!
Joe2/8/2010 12:12 PM
What a selfish Capt!!!Never liked Smith, and never will!!!
vincent2/8/2010 11:51 AM
Kirsten and Simons must be two happy chaps now that India is with their backs to the wall.
vincent2/8/2010 11:48 AM
kirsten and simons must be two happy chaps now that india is with their backs to the wall.
vincent2/8/2010 11:45 AM
Kirsten and Simons must be two happy chaps now that India is with their backs to the wall.
Beck@4112/8/2010 11:40 AM
Why is it always the race card that is playd with people?A player can be any colour and still have gr8 skills!Why would someone always blame white selectors for not choosing black players,the player must be good in all forms off the game. . .thats what selectors are looking for!So PLEASE people stop with that nonsense!
Go S.A Go2/8/2010 11:33 AM
Well Done Hash & Kall... If only other players and indeed nations take a leaf out of your book, then the expression "its just not cricket" will start to mean something again. What you guys bring to the sport is beyond Black, White Coloured and Indian... Keep it up, Proteas
S.A.B.2/8/2010 11:24 AM
centurion, you are a plank. so you can s.m.b!! i have a m3. wanna race??
Brad Naidoo2/8/2010 11:04 AM
Amla would have had about 10 overs to bat, not 3, as overs are reduced for the change of innings. Smith needn't have worried about losing time to get the last wicket as there is no concern about bad light and weather in India. All he did was give the Indians a 24 run start. Hashim WILL be the first South African to 300...and Smith can't stop that.. Notice how Kallis gets big runs when he bats with Amla, bats like a snail with Prince and plays loosely when with AB ???
Centurion2/8/2010 10:54 AM
JAF, your comment shows that you have even less understanding of the game than those whom you criticise. "Amla has drawn the game" and "the captain does not decide when to declare" - what nonsense.
rio2/8/2010 10:31 AM
lol lol lol greame was bang as hashim was about to become SA's greatest im sure he will pass him soon in my eyes hashim scored 300 easy look at the score he made half of it himself ha ha ha greame
Idiots2/8/2010 10:30 AM
The gay's, i mean guys that said that smith did not want his record broken is a load of idiots, if you knew anything about cricket you would understand his deceleration. don't comment if your IQ is below 10 please...
Piet2/8/2010 10:28 AM
Why are you people so naive? 3 overs people! 3 overs!! It's true that Smith should've declared before, but for the sake of 3 overs he declared just so that he can maintain his record. He's a sportsman with a lack of sportsmanship. If you play sports you will realise that there's no better feeling that holding/beating the record
Centurion2/8/2010 9:44 AM
Min, I thought Hash was South African of Indian origin - now it's classified as black? - I don't think so.
Proud Protea2/8/2010 9:40 AM
Cricket is a game of individual skills combining to form a team...emphasis the word "team". Hash didn't to beat Smith's record, its no train smash because judging by yesterday's batting performance it won't be long before he finally breaks it. Smith's declaration was too late if anything. SA had already been at the crease for nearly 2 days and there was no way Hash could've scored 24 runs in 5 overs (given his strike rate) because even had SA batted to the close Smith would still have to declare over night to get to the openiners before the sun baked the pitch further. So stop blaming Smith, he left the declaration for as long as possible so Hash could at least get to 250. To put this into perspective Sachin Tendulkar's highest score is 248 not out. Do you think he complained that he never got a chance to get to 250 or to pass Laxman's 281 (the Indian record)?
Hannetjie2/8/2010 9:19 AM
Well done Proteas - the start was disastrous but you made good !! congrats to Jacques and Hashim for excellent, world class batting - it was a pelasure to watch !!!!!!!! Hope our bowlers can continue the good work and we can get our no 1 spot in test cricket back !!!
Thabo Mofutsanyana2/8/2010 9:17 AM
All those people going on about breaking records should are only displaying a lack of knowledge and understanding for the game. Cricket like any other sport is about winning not breaking individual records. Amla did a great job for his team. Smith is a great captain can people stop being armchair critics and hypocritical and celebrate the good.
Min2/8/2010 9:10 AM
Well done Amla, I hope this shuts up those who have a to say about black players, especially saying blacks not belong in the cricket team, they should play soccer.
I have to admit2/8/2010 8:58 AM
i was one of the people he proved wrong...well done hash
Kube$2/8/2010 8:51 AM
Just remember Amla is a DHS(DURBAN HIGH SCHOOL) boy, well done boy...
Patriot2/8/2010 8:50 AM
I dont understand why some of you read the cricket posts if you clearly dont have a clue about cricket, Smith declared at the perfect time, and as a matter of fact it took Amla almost 3 overs to go from 199 to 200, How do you think he would hit another 30 off 3 overs, Weldone to all the Proteas
Waleed Toefy2/8/2010 8:41 AM
@6:20PM: with regards to the beard question. Its not compulsory in Islam to grow a beard but rather regarded as an "act" of piety. Basically emulating Prophet Muhammad, Prophet Isa (Jesus), Prophet Musa (Moses) (S.A.W.) and all the rest of the Prophets in the Quraan
AL @ Vic J2/8/2010 8:41 AM
Did Smith sleep with your wife or something?
jay2/8/2010 8:32 AM
why dont they move Amla to opening batsman and drop Prince to fourth. as it is the way Prince always goes out, Amla is then technically the opening batsman.
Khani2/8/2010 8:31 AM
Great Batting from Kallis and Amla and despite what some may think, The Declaration from Smith was perfect. Well Done Proteas - Now just bring the game home.
cricketfan2/8/2010 8:28 AM
WELL DONE SA AND HASHIM,PROVED ALOT OF POEPLE WRONG LIKE KEPLER AND BARRY RICHARDS. GO PROTEAS
Branden2/8/2010 8:27 AM
Great knock and support from the other batsman!!! Well it is a team sport, but couldnt Greame just took the message to Amla to get it on and score quicker? Before he decided to declare, there was a little injustice as other got the chances they deserved. Go Proteas!!!!
mxo2/8/2010 8:07 AM
Smith z selfish. With 4 overs to go, why declare? was he threatned that Amla wl break his record?
WILLIE2/8/2010 7:57 AM
Smith is a selfish pig.
gpwengineer2/8/2010 7:46 AM
Just proves Smith's immaturity and really with a pr1ck he is. If it was Kallis or Boucher, he would have given them the opportunity to reach the high score. Amla on the other hand, was robbed. How often does a batsman get a chance to aim for a countries highest individual score.
AJ - to the geniuses.2/8/2010 7:45 AM
It is worth noting that Amla faced exactly 100 balls more for his 253 than Smith did for his 277 in England. Hashim and Jaques both had ample opportunity to beat Smith's 277 and even post 300 each. Calling Smith's declaration into question, is pathetic.
Jakes2/8/2010 6:53 AM
Brilliant Amla, keep on doing a good job, wrench the living daylights out of them.
AJ @ Oz2/8/2010 5:31 AM
Those "lilly white selectors" are actually not all white (by a long shot), and are the same selectors that have kept faith with Hashim. But dont let some actual facts ruin your 'story'. @ The Cutman - Kallis had a perfect opportunity to better the record but lost his wicket, so your posting makes no sense either. They both had 2 full days to bat, there were 300's out there for both of them, but the going was tough. Hardly Smith's fault.
Selvan2/8/2010 2:55 AM
Grame Smit is a selfish captain and did not give Hashim the chance to break his record .
JB2/8/2010 1:04 AM
Listen to all you guys that think this was a decision by Smith to prevent his record being broken. so what if we get to the final few overs needing one wicket and we failt to get it AGAIN. Will all of you start b*tching at Smith because he didn't declare early enough! And for 'F' sakes, why the hell does race have to creep in to every single bloody blog on this website. @ Oz - it's got bugger all to do with being Asian you twit! So wind you neck in and just be happy that SA are smashing India in India!
SA cricket fan2/7/2010 11:17 PM
Ben. All mentioned makes sence. And respect therefor. My point is very simple: a batsman is offered such a chance to break records perhaps once in 10 years (see Smiths 200+ scores in Eng almost 6-7 years ago). It arrives once and cricket is a bigger sport than individuels. Therefor I believe that Smith/coach/other should have offered him the opportunity to present his best and break a SA record. What did the WI do when Lara was to break the world record for the individual highest score? Declare? They offered him the opportunity. 10 more overs extra over 3 days?? Lets be realistic, Amla deserved to opportunity to do it! Its lost now for ever and I (many other) will always wonder why SA declared at that time? Did they perhaps send him a message? Was it a surprise to Amla? I would have respected Smith for ever, should he have offered Amla the opportunity! (Like the team did for Smith to beat Kirsten's record, or should they have declared earlier?) In the bigger picture of SA cricket I'm actually personally disgusted..... Smith won't ever confince me of being a player of the cricket. Perhaps Smith's overall attitude made Strauss decide that Smith could not be granted a runner in he previous champs competition... because Smith doesn't derserve respect, even from his oponents.... Just a thought/view and no personal attack on Smith/couch/management/ selector/you.
Sharks supporter2/7/2010 9:59 PM
I think that a declaration before the close of play was on the cards from the beginning of the day's play when I said we need 600 runs on the board and one Indian wicket down at the close of play. I was surprised that Kallis played so defensively this morning, but he was the man in the middle and must have had his reasons. Cricket historians correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to recall a former SA captain declaring the innings closed with same Kallis scratching around in the nervous nineties, a few runs short of what would have been one of his first test tons. Test cricket is a team game.
Mo2/7/2010 9:44 PM
Dud declaration! The pitch was never going to produce a wicket in the last three overs, unless Smith was going to use his spinners. The wicket will be hard in the morning (cold), and will be much more responsive, and he knows it! Smith made the wrong decision. I just hope that his decision was a team one. But judging from the expression on his face today as Amla came ever so closer to his record, I'm not too sure!
Shorts2/7/2010 9:30 PM
Fantastic batting performance Hashim - well done.
Ben2/7/2010 8:43 PM
First: Congratulations to Amla - that was a fantastic knock! Second, to those complaining about Smith's declaration decision: Unless you are new to test cricket, you will understand that in this fantastic dominant position where you can declare at a time of your choosing that is most advantageous to the team, it is very common to declare late in the day. If anything, he probably should have declared about 5 to 10 overs earlier. The idea is to give your fresh fast bowlers a chance to take a few wickets before close of play, but still make sure the ball is fairly new the next morning when there may be a little dew around on the pitch and at the same time restart for a second time with an essentially new ball and refreshed bowlers. I think he gave Amla more than enough time to get as high as possible a score, and the guy will have that little asterisk next to his score meaning it could have been even bigger. You have to really have a personal problem with Smith to think the decision was made just to prevent Amla from passing his record.
MP2/7/2010 8:40 PM
If SA batted on...Hashim would of had 5 overs.... 2 overs lost for change of inners...
Goose2/7/2010 8:21 PM
Well done Hash,you deserved that double and Graeme your declaration was a perfect team decision. A lot of us that understand cricket know that you would of declared earlier,but gave Hash that chance to get that 250 - good on you Biff.
pdw2/7/2010 8:16 PM
All of those that winge about the timing of the declaration - go play Mini Cricket! Posting a huge score like that, you allways run the risk of killing off any chance of getting a result. Hash wouldn't have scored those 24 runs in 3 overs, and thereby waste a day...Sachten alek, Hash! @Amla - those players aren't as religous - in Islam, as in Judiasm, you arn't allowed to put a blade to your hair. Beautiful so far, boys, now bowl 'em out!!!
ZM2/7/2010 8:08 PM
At an average of close to 50 with a strike rate of over 80 in ODI's - the biggest puzzle is why amla isnt in the 1 day team
@steadfast2/7/2010 7:19 PM
grow up idiot. Well Smith is doing much better than Prince
Matt Nel2/7/2010 6:52 PM
Amla is the man - great stuff. Good to see our talented players make runs!
Nazeer2/7/2010 6:34 PM
Congrats Amla we are proud of you.
Steadfast2/7/2010 6:21 PM
What break my record - I will show you. The unnatural declaration 3 overs before end of play proves that Smith did not want his record broken. hell there are 3 days left to play, so another 10 over and amla has record. Never would happen. To all you smith fans - what more proof do you need to prove that this man is a pronker of Feb 2010.
Oz2/7/2010 6:20 PM
Great Knock Hash. Well, you always prove by your action. This should be egg in the face of the lilly white selectors and Gerald Majola. These were the same cuplprits that have dropped you from the one day team. It is just like the politics and organization in South Africa. If you are an Asian then you only good for doing the dirty work of making other people look good, and then you receive a kick. Not one of the selectors will be able to provide a palusible explanation to having you dropped. It is a matter of not being white enough during apartheid and not Black enough in South Africa.
Amla2/7/2010 6:20 PM
I know he said its his relegion but how come the guys from India and Pakistan shave
William Shakespeare2/7/2010 6:16 PM
Don't worry folks... Amla, like Cullinan, will always have that little "not out" asterisk next to his score... an the implied "what if?" which has a sweetness all of its own. Smith is to be applauded for giving Amla the chance to bat on when he knew he was doing so at the cost of the much-needed declaration. This time he did good. Hats off.
Ash2/7/2010 6:08 PM
Great performance by our boys,Would have liked to have seen Amla reach a higher total for which I think he was aiming for, but at the end of the day,captain is King,no 1 can complain,not even the coach,or else he would be sacked
kass 2/7/2010 6:07 PM
I've seen some people comment that Graeme Smith was selfish for not allowing Hashim Amla to get to 277 or 300. It is not about personal milestones but rather about putting the team first. Hash will be the first to admit that. Let's not take the gloss off his feat... Well played Hash, what a moment for you!!! GO PROTEAS!!!
Vic J2/7/2010 5:50 PM
SG, there are no problems but facts,are you related to Smith?
JAF2/7/2010 5:46 PM
People are very naive and need to understand cricket a a lot more. Cricket is not about individuals, but a team sport. Proteas should have declared with an hour of play left to give bolwers a better chance. Amla had ample chance to up his pace and he wasted it. He has actually "drawn" this game for the Proteas already. Also Smith is not the one who makes the decisions regarding declarations, there are people involved at management level.
h 2/7/2010 5:41 PM
The declaration should have come earlier, perhaps smith was giving amla a chance at the record but amla's runs dried up , he scored only 15 runs in over 60 balls at the end. Team comes first, give smith a break
SG2/7/2010 4:59 PM
I really have a lot of respect for Amla. He is such a great guy that he will be the last man who will complain about the decision to declare.He will know that cricket is not primary about individuals. You guys are really sees a problem in everything.
MO2/7/2010 4:56 PM
Graeme declared as amla was about to break his record....say wat you want but the chap only needed 24runs...cmon smith
Vic J2/7/2010 4:45 PM
What stupid decleration, 3 overs to go. Should have continued but maybe Smith wanted to retain his record. Well done Hasim and KZN is very proud of you.
The Cutman2/7/2010 4:44 PM
While Smith is captain, I will bet my bottom dollar that no one will better his records.
Tshepo2/7/2010 4:44 PM
Well done Hashim....Records tumbled down!!
Billy of Arabia2/7/2010 4:40 PM
The rising star has arrived - absolute pleasure to watch, an excellent performance by Hashim and Kallis and the rest of the team. Looking forward to his next double centry. WOW!
Ams 2/7/2010 4:23 PM
Great knock Hash!! Just a pity that he didn't get the opportunity to break the SA record.
Your Name
*
Email
*
Comment
*
 
Please enter the text below:

*
 
 

The lighter side of Francois Hougaard

Best goal celebration ever?

Best penalty ever?

 Front Row Grunt - Tank's blog

Info on the op Bismarck is recovering from

Featured Blog

Lobo salutes Muttiah Muralidaran's genius. He developed the doosra into an art form and terrorised batsmen with his cunning and his wily ways. Although his career was overshadowed by the "chucking" controversy, no-one will ever beat his mark of 800 Test wickets.

Latest blogs

Overhaul in Formula 1 7/29/2010 3:47:49 PM

Knowledge Musona is SA's Jet Club Rookie of the Year. 7/29/2010 3:44:19 PM

Currie cup predictions 7/29/2010 3:17:15 PM

Vote

Now that the several versions of the game have had some time to settle, which is the version that tickles your fancy the most?

Who is your Hero?

Nominate your hero and win R10 000!

RSS Feeds

RSS Feeds Sport news delivered really simply.

Mobile

Mobile Sport24 on your mobile phone - WAP, alerts, downloads, services

Free Email

Free Email Get a free 24.com e-mail account and stay in touch

Blogs

Blogs Yes your opinion counts. Get it out there

TV

TV schedule Plan your couch time with our searchable sport TV guide