ArthurTurner

Oz IPL dominance unhealthy

2009-05-12 08:37
Email | Print
Sport24 columnist Arthur Turner (File)

Arthur Turner

Australia’s dominance of the Indian Premier league is unhealthy. Lalit Modi and the IPL will have to ensure a better balance of coaches for a more objective approach to contracting. They need to ensure that the best foreign players are being contracted to improve the standard of the competition.

Five of the franchises are coached by Australians and only two of them have international experience, John Buchanan and Tom Moody.

The fact that coaches like Greg Shipperd, Darren Lehmann and Darren Berry who are unknown outside of Australia have managed to secure rich IPL contracts proves that Australia as a cricketing nation is totally over rated.

This problem is clearly reflected in the contracting of foreign players to the eight franchise squads. Each franchise is allowed to contract a maximum of 10 foreign players but only four are allowed to play in any given match. No less than 26 Australians have managed to secure IPL contracts. This number does not include probably at least 10 of their top players like Ricky Ponting and Mitchell Johnson who have decided not to play in the IPL in 2009 because of the forthcoming Ashes series in England or those who are injured like Shaun Marsh.

In comparison, South Africa who are rated the number one limited over team in the world and easily beat Australia in the two recent ODI series’ have only 15 players in the IPL. Only two of these players - Dillon du Preez and Ryan McLaren - have not played international cricket. McLaren was chosen for the Proteas but was forced to withdraw because of his Kent Kolpak contract.

Ten of these Australian players have never, and in all probably will never, play for their country in any form of the game and have very ordinary or poor T20 records. Burt Cockley from New South Wales is yet to play a T20 game for his state but has been contracted by the Kings XI Punjab who are coached by Moody.

If one draws a comparison with the Australian players to certain South Africans it tells the true story.

For example if one looks at Rob Quiney. a batsman from Victoria who plays for the Rajasthan Royals. In 21 matches he has scored 299 runs at an average of 14.95 with a strike rate of 112.44. Henry Davids in 34 matches has scored 545 runs at an average of 20.14 with a strike rate of 140.44. He has also scored a 41-ball hundred in the Pro20 series while Quiney’s highest score is 91.

Another good comparison is Ryan Harris from New South Wales who plays for the Deccan Chargers coached by Lehmann. In 16 matches he has scored 86 runs at an average of 10.75 with a strike rate of 95.55. He has taken 18 wickets with an economy rate of 6.87. Compare this to Rory Kleinveldt who has played 38 matches and scored 338 runs at an average of 16.09 with a strike rate of 159.43. He has also taken 34 wickets with an economy rate of 7.23.

This is ample proof that the dominance of Australian coaches is favouring some very ordinary international and especially state cricketers in Australia. The Australian coaches are not held accountable because the franchises are owned by the Bollywood stars who know nothing about the game of cricket. They are only interested in seeing themselves on television and enhancing their own profiles and fulfilling their egos.

The IPL will have to address these problems and create equity in the future contracting process to ensure that the standards and profile of the tournament are maintained if it is to remain the Premiership of T20 cricket.

Arthur is a former cricket administrator and current player agent.

Disclaimer: Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.

 

Your Comments

drmony6/17/2009 2:38 PM
i also thnk that australia is overrated cricket nation if u not gonna believe me thn chk records of t20...even in eng 2009 ausiies are gone out through first round with those third class stupid cricket nations(holland,scotlnad,bangladesh) so its time to move to sa,sl,or nz
James 6/3/2009 6:38 AM
Wayne Parnell & Yusuf Abdulla , No experience? How will they get experiene if you dont play them. You said the same about Hashim Amla. He is our number 3 batmen will always looked for .
Anonymous User5/17/2009 1:41 PM
i would like to, at this point, give some quick grammatical help to a few people out there who clearly lack certain elementary language skills. i quote from Dougie "The fact that coaches like Greg Shipperd, Darren Lehmann and Darren Berry who are unknown outside of Australia have managed to secure rich IPL contracts proves that Australia as a cricketing nation is totally over rated." Surely it instead suggests that Australia is a highly rated cricketing nation ". Dougie, Yes, you are right, it does indicate that they are highly rated. However, and this is where you grasp of English lets you down, said high rating can still be higher than is justified, and hence making them overrated. Personally I agree with Arthur, Henriques ahead of Langeveldt is nuts. And I challenge anyone to explain to me how i am wrong about that.
Freshly Ground5/15/2009 4:13 PM
@ You must be chocking. Dude what are you smoking? SA has lost one test series in three years (Australia, recently) and one ODI series in two years (England, last year). What the hell are bleating about consistency for? Jeez, what more do you want? Old Archie is yet again speaking drivel, who cares about the make up of the teams and coaches, as long as it is enjoyable I don't really care. On second thought maybe we should apply quotas, we are S African after all...
Anonymous User5/14/2009 3:45 AM
dude get real !!!!.... i can name about 3 south africans who have done well consistently in the IPL.......the aussies.....I can list a bunch doing a good job...... totally biased article...... plus the aussies have the best domestic set up of any country...so makes sense that their best domestic players are playing in the IPL>...... just coz they haven't represented the national side (which is only 11 ppl) ...doesnt mean they are no good.. AND FOR GOOD MEASURE>>.... go and check the stats.....looks like the chart is dominated by the aussie players..... who made you a cricket writer/analyst any ways....
Nathan5/14/2009 2:20 AM
Do south african sports journalists do anything other than whine about Australians?! Without wanting to add any degree of balance or reality to a ridiculous debate, I have to suggest that the high number of Australian coaches and players may have a small connection to the fact that the dominant players in the first edition of the IPL were mostly Australian. We get it Turner, south africans are a lot better than Australians. It's just that the rest of the cricket world disagrees with you ...
Sunny Dutt5/13/2009 4:32 PM
The Rajasthan Royals is run by 1 man plain and simple, Shane Warne. Darren Berry is his sidekick. Never get that confused. Otherwise this is a poorly written article!
Bruce Knowalotaboutcricket5/13/2009 4:06 PM
I must add that this article is extremely biased and one sided. The best team in the world would naturally have the most players and coaches in the IPL. You can't argue that SA is the best team in the world after having the title for such a short time.
Tim5/13/2009 2:48 PM
Is the "Arthur" who agreed with the article - the only person who appears to have, I might add - the same "Arthur" who wrote the article? If so, I can only admire his persistence...
Anonymous User5/13/2009 1:43 PM
This is utter journalistic drivel. The fact that IPL 1 had been dominated by Aussie players (Marsh, Watson, Hayden, Gilly, Warne) and IPL 2 has been following the same vein is proof that this article is nothing more than an extremely biased view taken by an Aussie hating 'agent' who happens to have public exposure for his pen. Aus has been regarded throughout the cricketing world for having the strongest domestic competition and you're one of the first to say otherwise, furthermore with no proof. Spouting sparse player stats does not warrant proof, particularly in T20 where batting average is a stat that is often ignored in pursuit of strike rate. Sport24 editing should be ashamed to let an idiot like yourself continue to post your nonsense!
Matt5/13/2009 11:39 AM
Someone looking to cash in on the dollars...you must be a terrible player agent because you wouldn't be writing this if any of your players were in the IPL. Surely you should be cashing on some diet plans......
Michael5/13/2009 11:20 AM
Unbalanced, unjustified, agenda-seeking drivel is unhealthy for Sport24, and the editors will have to address this problem to ensure the standards and profile of the website are maintained if it is to remain even remotely credible to the majority of the cricket loving public.
UMustBeChoking5/13/2009 11:11 AM
More of the usual sporting arrogance that we've come to expect from a former SA cricket administrator and now a player agent. Sounds to me like sour grapes. Maybe when the SA team shows some consistency in all forms of the game over a prolonged period of consecutive matches in a range of countries - and not disillusion it's best cricketers because of biased selection policy - only then will your words carry weight. As things stand, they are as empty as a eunuch's trousers.
Danno5/13/2009 11:03 AM
Well-spotted, Dougie. Arthur is a South African player agent complaining about the lack of lucrative IPL contracts for South Africans. Sounds like just another pig looking to get his snout in the trough. By the way, the South African team is very good at the moment and good on them, they're playing really well. But when they've been on top for more than ten minutes, there might be more confidence in South Africa's first-class level. One moment in the sunshine sometimes just means you've got 11 good players in a peaking together (see England circa 2005). When you've been on top for 20 years, people start to talk about depth and first-class strength. Sorry, but that's how it is.
SamD5/13/2009 10:55 AM
Absolute rubbish ...penned by a player agent who is unhappy he isn't getting more of the action. The reason Australians are being hired is because of the strength of Australian cricket and it's players overall. When SA or England or whoever else can consistently point to results and depth of talent at a national level then you'll see new trends accordingly. This is the free market in action mate. If it works people will be buy it. If it doesn't they'll move on. Get a life...
Dougie5/13/2009 10:29 AM
How interesting to read at the end of the article that Mr Turner is a current player agent. I wonder if he has any other interests? I found this piece of logic particularly interesting: "The fact that coaches like Greg Shipperd, Darren Lehmann and Darren Berry who are unknown outside of Australia have managed to secure rich IPL contracts proves that Australia as a cricketing nation is totally over rated." Surely it instead suggests that Australia is a highly rated cricketing nation. The limited comparisons provided are also quite bizarre. Ryan Harris - who has, by the way, represented Australia - is very much a bowling allrounder. His superior bowling figures (strike rate & economy) would then seem to suggest he is the better choice. I'd imagine one of the motivators behind the IPL choices of second string Australian players is, as has been suggested above, the domination & strength of Australian cricket over the past decade. That players like Darren Lehmann, Stuart Law, Brad Hodge, Michael Hussey, and so on, spent so long on the outer of the Australian side has been a sign of their strength and depth. See county cricket for similar attitudes - and compare the successes there of Aussies vs the Kolpak South Africans. ni!
vas5/13/2009 8:53 AM
What the hell are you on about??? Aussie dominance may be unhealthy. It's justified though given the country's rate of success over the last decade. Australia's domestic competition consistently nurtures the best cricketers in the world, and that is a credit to the system in place, including the coaches. Buchanan is still Australia's most successful coach of all time (regardless of his tenure at KKR), while Tom Moody has had a distinguished time in Worcestershire along with Sri Lanka and now with Western Australia. Shane Warne is the best captain Australia never had, Greg Shipperd won the Shield title in his 1st season after David Hookes was killed, and Darren Lehmann was a leadership figure for South Australia and Yorkshire. All these five men have attributes that made them worthy choices to be coaches of their teams. And these men would look to their own patch for people they regard as top talents. I am sure, with time, that other cricketers will get a look-in. But you pointing players like Henriques, Ryan Harris or Rob Quiney that aren't making the most of their chances, you have others like Dirk Nannes, Shane Watson and Shaun Marsh who have been IPL success stories. So next time consider the whole story. I wonder what Makhaya Ntini has been doing for Chennai this year?
Jason5/13/2009 8:47 AM
One reason would be the success of the Royals last year. Captained and coached by an Australian. Another the success of Shaun Marsh and Shane Watson. I'm sure many officials in the league were probably thinking, 'wow if these are the kind of Aussies we could get for a cheap price, who else might be out there?' That is not necessarily the RIGHT thought, but I can see why Australians are the trend at the moment. Copycat tactics is not just a product of the IPL, many major leagues in sport around the world reflect the same trend. Try and follow the champion and star players and try to replicate how a team was built or what sort of players to look for.
Arthur 5/13/2009 8:09 AM
I agree with you. Aussie coaches are milking team owners, getting their family and friends involved, the coach of the team at the bottom of the log has his son and nephew and wifes brother all earning money from "coaching". There should be a limit on the number of coaches, support staff and also the number of players from a particular country.
Anonymous User5/13/2009 8:07 AM
err why pick a few mostly unknown aussies? Why not point out that aussie players are dominating on the pitch as well as in the coaching? if it wasn't for the big name aussies like warne the ipl would be dead.
Rex5/13/2009 8:05 AM
This is what Gavaskar said about how the Kolkata Knight Riders was being run. He clearly pointed out that Buchanan (former Australia coach and present coach of the Kolkata franchise, owned by Shah Rukh Khan, famous Bollywood star) had brought in a lot of his fellow Australians as support staff, most of which is unnecessary for a T20 tournament. What's more, he also felt that the presence of so many staff members only acted as detriment to the team and made it more expensive to run. In his own words "The poor franchise owners don't realise that they are being robbed." Good point Arthur. Hope the franchise owners understand that there are better players all over the World- even in India as well. Buchanan has been persisting with Henriques and other lesser players while International stars like Mendis and Langelveldt warm the dugouts. Clearly shows what kind of poor cricket mind he has. The Aussies he originally coached (Warne, McGrath, Steve Waugh etc.) don't rate him too much.
Phadnis5/13/2009 7:44 AM
I agree, I guess once there teams start to loose and it starts biting owner's pockets then they will wake up and smell the grass. Till that time I don't see a reason why Aussies should not milk the gullible owners.
Andrew5/13/2009 7:36 AM
Yes, they had no obligation, but they had little choice. Australia's time difference is to great for their core audience (India), Ditto New Zealand, England would probably not want to detract from their current series against the West Indies and is often faced with poor weather conditions, Sri Lanka does not have the facilities and Pakistan has security issues. Lets not even mention Zimbabwe. That essentially leaves us. It's not like they really wanted to come here, they had to.
Anonymous User5/13/2009 7:36 AM
Give it time, and IPL will keep reflecting the status of who is dominating international cricket at that point in time. If SL is dominating, u might see more SL players, its as simple as that. There has been a general perception that Australian domestic system is the best and that not a single good cricketer is missed out by the system. Hence the punt with Aussie cricketers. If it doesnt work out, teams will learn and adapt accordingly. Already Buchanan has done tremendous damage to his team, and his stock has plummeted in India. I will be highly surprised if he and his assistants are around next year as well. Maybe a South African coach is what KKR needs.
Anonymous User5/13/2009 5:36 AM
One swallow does not make a summer in South African cricket, it has has history of being the best teams between world cups. Therefore do not count your chickens before they hatch. Monty From Down Under.
Colin5/12/2009 4:58 PM
All I can say is let's enjoy the IPL whilst we can, whoever plays in the teams. Remember, the Indians were under no obligation to stage the tournement in SA, it could have happened in England or maybe even Australia and most of us wouldn't have followed the series the way we have because it is in SA - then we wouldn't have had anything to moan about!
Craig5/12/2009 2:51 PM
I agree totally, Aurthur knows what he is talking about, Lily White and Co missed the point completely, the australians are milking the team owners, getting their family and friends involved, the coach of the team at the bottom of the log has his son and nephew and wifes brother all earning money from "coaching" - so many coaches and his team is last, then helping australians that will clearly not make it in australia earn some big money, no wonder some of these idiots arent leaving their names, with the stupid comments they leave.
Sam5/12/2009 2:30 PM
There are certain valid points that you are making Arthur. But it does sound a bit like a bitch and moan. At the end of the day all they trying to do with IPL is to get cricket alive around the (cricket) world again. The teams have thrown their backing behind a few big names and balanced out the 10 with outside names. Might be more Australian, but like some other readers have pointed out, if u command the cricket world for 10 years thats the 1st place you'll come knocking. As far as ability goes, one of my coaches had a favourite saying, "cricket is a great leveller". Case and point KP. $1.5m buys u 93 runs in 6 matches at an average of 15 and strike rate under 110. So the contracts given are not guarenteed results on the field, but support of certain teams. Which results is bigger gate number, bigger merchandise sales, more money for the team etc etc. And at the end of the day thats what the owners are all about.
Nick5/12/2009 2:03 PM
i 100% concur. why for the love of pete did kolkatta secure the best bowler in South Africa'n conditions (and debatably one of the best bowlers in south africa full stop) Charl langevelt, a man with an extraordinary T20 record, and get to this stage of teh competition playing virtual no-bodies like Henriques, and selecting A SECOND INTERNATIONAL WICKETKEEPER???? the mind boggles. it really does.
Mr Controvesy5/12/2009 1:57 PM
Maybe you should become a Bollywood Star, purchase an IPL Franchise, and maybe someone will wright the same stuff about you..LOL...!!!!!! The fact that you are witing an article about the IPL and their owners and not the other way around, is proof enough that you feeling left out, of all the IPL action. As I said taking some singing, dancing and acting lessons, become a star and purchase your own team. Maybe start off by auditioning for one of the cheerleaders post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous User5/12/2009 1:25 PM
I wonder who advised Ryan McClaren to become a Kolpak player? Might it be his agent Auther Turner? Auther you ruined Ryan's chances of playing for his country.
Dale5/12/2009 11:52 AM
Im normally the first to disagree with Arthur, but I agree 100% on this issue. While some extraordinary justification can be made for South Africans without international experience playing (due to home conditions), I cannot see any reason whatsoever for uncapped Australians to be playing in the IPL. Aside from the traditional test countries, there are a number of far better & more exciting prospects from the associate countries that I would much rather be watching. Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Afghanistan, & Kenya just recently played in SA, & all have at least 1 or 2 players that would add much more value to the IPL, & it would also benefit those individuals & countries far more by having them playing in teams with world superstars of the game.
james.5/12/2009 11:38 AM
bollywood stars who know nothing about cricket...do you actually know any indians? they're all cricket mad!
Anonymous User5/12/2009 11:36 AM
Second bottom team dominated by SA players and coached by Ray Jennings. 5 SA and 1 AUSSIE in squad.Top 4 teams has more AUSSIE players than SA players and coached by 3 AUSSIES and 1 NZ coach.Get the message?
Anonymous User5/12/2009 11:35 AM
They must probably pick some of SA, because they previously disadvantage. He, Arthur what is your case?? Or are you looking for more contracts for your players and a coaching joppie for you??
Anonymouse5/12/2009 11:29 AM
sorry arthur, but lilly white is right... it merely reflects australias dominance of the game. remember. im not talking the past two series. im talking the past ten years in a row. and as they say, they are privately owned teams.. eventually owners will be caught out for their poor decisions and for throwing good money at bad players! i know it hurts the purists.. but IPL is cricket's version of the Premier League.. now we just need IPL's version of Roman Abramovich to cause a stir :D
Frank5/12/2009 11:20 AM
The IPL is unfortunatly already losing its lustre, many people have already lost interest and the 2nd installment of this competition is not even over. The fact that only 4 internationals are allowed to start per game means that some very average indian players are on display for most of the time not withstanding some very dull and average aussies. IPL would be alot more interesting if 7 internationals could be included, regretfully as well many of the worlds best rather rest for national commitments. Watching a internal indian league match with 1 or 2 world class players ios just not very exciting and how the tournament is being punted.
Matt5/12/2009 11:19 AM
Another good example is how of Charl Langevelt, rated as the best Pro20 Bowler in the world yet he hasn't play a single game for the useless Knight Riders, yet the Aussie Moises keeps getting a run even though he has proved to be nothing more than a club cricketer.
keith5/12/2009 11:09 AM
I can't believe this article was actually published. I know we give the Aussies a run for their money as often as we can but this is just ridiculous! I think the writer is just annoyed because Biff reports to Warne.
Brett5/12/2009 10:14 AM
This guys a plonker! Get your wallet out and start your own tournament. These Bollywood stars might not know too much about the game, but they've started something great and exciting... more than your stupid boring column!
Div5/12/2009 9:56 AM
In some ways I agree with Athur, the IPL coaches should be more global and in that regard we will truly see the best of the best international players in the IPL, but some of those unknown AUS players have done really well like Nannes.
Anonymous User5/12/2009 9:48 AM
I couldn't have said it better! Arthur, why don't you write something positive for a change and stop looking for sensation where there's none to be found!
Spongebob5/12/2009 9:35 AM
I Agree with lily White, what are you on about. Just watch and enjoy the games. This is afterall the point of the IPL. Go cheerleaders.
jiminy cricket5/12/2009 9:20 AM
Are you going slightly mad? These are private teams, you are not fitting the bill for the players. Find something else to be petty about. Why does there have to be a moan about everything in this country?
Lily White5/12/2009 9:07 AM
What are you going on about? These are private teams that select whoever they want for the job based on whatever criteria they deem fit. They don't have to answer to anyone except the shareholders. Whether the whole foreign legion is Australian or South African or French is up to them and they dont have to justify themselves to anyone. Next year they might chose more South African coaches. Or maybe Indian coaches. The fact that most of the coaches and players are Australian is proof of Oz dominance of the game in the recent past. This has only recently changed to South Africa being no.1, so you might see more South Africans in the IPL in the next few years... What's wrong with you?
Your Name
*
Email
*
Comment
*
 
Please enter the text below:

*
 
 
Columns by this Writer
Proteas: Next stop India
After squaring their Test series against England in ruthless fashion, the SA's next assignment is winning in India, writes Arthur Turner.
We need a real opener
The experiment of opening with Ashwell Prince has been a failure writes Arthur Turner, and the time for change has come.
Featured Blog

So Freddy gives more than just the people on Elm street nightmares, which selection of players from the Super14 would cause you to lose sleep at night? Having seen the Sport24 Dream Team, Darwinia names and shames her local bottomdwellers ...

Latest blogs

FIFA owns SA 3/19/2010 2:57:51 PM

One day in your life 3/19/2010 2:03:38 PM

Sport24 Blog-plonker nominations . . . 3/19/2010 12:52:53 PM

Who is your hero?

Nominate your hero and win R 10 000!

RSS Feeds

RSS Feeds Sport news delivered really simply.

Mobile

Mobile Sport24 on your mobile phone - WAP, alerts, downloads, services

Free Email

Free Email Get a free 24.com e-mail account and stay in touch

Blogs

Blogs Yes your opinion counts. Get it out there

TV

TV schedule Plan your couch time with our searchable sport TV guide