Share

Stormers props spot on

Lots of moaning about “scrumming in” given the Stormers’ man-handling of the Bulls scrum at Newlands on Saturday, mostly by scribes and fans based up north it seems.

I disagree, believing both Stormers loosehead props Steven Kitshoff and Ollie Kebble to have had magnificent games, with their destruction of Bulls tighthead Marcel van der Merwe going a long way to securing the game for the home side. Sadly by means of one of the scourges of the modern game – the scrum penalty, often based on one poor chunky fellow having a bad day at the office. Penalising a prop for standing up in a scrum is a bit like penalising a flyhalf for missing a tackle.

That said, most tries these days come from another scourge of the game – the legalised obstruction that is the driving maul (now seemingly made even more in defendable given that refs are allowing players to join them ahead of the last players feet – go watch the David Pocock hat trick of tries if you are unsure of what I am talking about) so it makes sense for teams to make the most of the situation. Hence the Stormers aiming to milk the scrum penalty rather than use it to set a stable base from which the backs could work.

I digress, though. Back to Saturday and this “scrumming in”. A loosehead’s job is in fact to scrum in on the tighthead’s ribs, or better get under him and work on his sternum, thus hoping to unsettle him and move him backwards. A tighthead’s job is to keep that loosehead’s head out thus hoping to create a gap between said loosehead and his hooker, with a view to scrumming forward through that gap.

Choose not to scrum in, and a loosehead is then opting out of the contest, sliding down the side of the tighthead, giving him an easy ride. That is truly dreadful technique. Something Dean Greyling is sometimes prone to doing.

So this penalising of scrumming in is in fact penalising a player for doing his job. If a tighthead is not strong (or good) enough to keep the loosehead out, then he should pay the price.

Let’s also remember that getting your angle right as a prop requires skill. Get it wrong and the power from behind tends to push your arse out. And while many analysts will then point to the “dreadful” scrumming in, as a prop all you have done is create a weak link in the chain so instead of that power being channelled through your straight back, it is being used to force your arse out.

Is scrumming in such a sin? Have we not over complicated the scrum ridiculously?

Refs are guessing. Scrums are being reset endlessly. And game influencing penalties are being awarded to avoid these resets. I would simplify them by making the following changes to scrum laws:

· Allow props to bind anywhere

· Allow props to put knees and hands on the ground to stabilise the scrum

· Allow scrumming in (but penalise popping)

· Allow props under pressure to stand up (aiming to avoiding collapses)

· Allow non-violent wheeling through 45 degrees (it’s a skill)

Apart from the Stormers management and players, no one likes to see a game won on scrum penalties. Scrum dominance getting you a right shoulder or pushover try, yes, but not penalties based on guesswork or a player having a bad scrum.

And while it might be good enough to top the SA conference, living off scrum penalties is not going to win you the tournament.

Tank is a former Western Province tighthead prop who now heads up Tankman Media, and sprouts forth on all things rugby on the Front Row Grunt.

Disclaimer: Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24. 
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should Siya Kolisi keep the captaincy as the Springboks build towards their World Cup title defence in 2027?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Siya will only be 36 at the next World Cup. He can make it!
25% - 1216 votes
No! I think the smart thing to do is start again with a younger skipper ...
30% - 1416 votes
I'd keep Siya captain for now, but look to have someone else for 2027.
45% - 2147 votes
Vote
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE